We aim to never raise our sights above the gutter and preferably to stay much lower
What is your soul really?
"Proofs" of the existence of the soul's existence are simple confusions with biologically created consciousness. When something
frightens us for example, scientists can see the brain activities that cause the feeling. Purely chemical changes in the body can
directly influence such things. We may be more emotional about a stirring bit of music that brings back memories if we have
had a few drinks beforehand. Still, assuming you are daft enough to believe in one, logic will probably not persuade you and, after all,
we admit we can't totally prove that there is not some supernatural being inside you that has an independent existence, that will go on living
long after you do.
But let's say you are right. That this creature really does exist, is it necessarily some superior form of your existence placed there
by god for his purpose? Or could it actually be something totally malignant, like the parasitic wasp that lives
inside a "Zombie Caterpillar"?
Mankind could have an enormous potential, we may be capable of developing an advanced world free of conflicts,
but we never acheive it because, shortly after conception, we are all invaded by a parasitic supernatural being who drains our
intellects and feelings for its own sustenance. When we die, it leaves its larval existence, briefly becoming a mature adult so it can mate
and produce an egg to go inside the next new born baby.
Who knows for sure? Sorted the next xoggoth short story anyway.
Hmm. If the price of coffee rises too much it might become economic to recover this wasted caffeine. Watch out for a Costa shop at
your local sewage works.
Simplifying mankind again
Was going to pour later so went for a walk early today while there was only very light drizzle.
In the open anyway. It sounded like it was raining heavily whenever I was in the shelter of the trees. The obvious explanation is that the
thin rain was coalescing on the upper foliage and creating much larger drops that were falling on the lower leaves.
Can human behaviour sometimes work like that? Man is a social animal, but as with all social animals from
Meerkats to Chimps, this sociability does not take the form of a bond with mankind in general but with those who are like us.
Extreme views may be spread out thinly among a population, few of us are totally reasonable about every issue. But coalesce those,
mostly reasonable, human beings together where they can share and reinforce those less acceptable attitudes and a minor problem can
become a much larger one. Peer pressure is a major determinant of human behaviour and
extremism is a relative thing. Somebody wanting strict Shariah law imposed on all will view himself and be seen as less extreme,
have more influence, if he never goes outside an ethnic group where many think that religious belief should shape our society.
Prominent ranters and extremist websites need to be stopped but, unless we act to heel the divisions in society and kick out the
ridiculous notion that multi culturalism is always a good thing, regardless of what that culture stands for, more will just pop up.
Ok, if you have something in your recent memory it will leap out if you see it again. As I always say, coincindences are
self created. Nevertheless, it happens so often that you see something and then see it again and again in totally unrelated articles
I sometimes wonder.
This morning saw
an article on Lyme disease and made a note as I do a lot of country wandering. Just now I looked at the onlne
papers and there's
a story about Lyme disease possibly being contagious, contrary to accepted wisdom that you can only catch it from ticks.
2 minutes later I looked at
Mr Sheep's blog comment on the Simpsons and wondered who the gay teacher was.
Checked a Mr Bergstorm and it mentions somebody having Lyme disease.
Can't remember what it was now but just yesterday was another similar bizarre coincidence.
From now on, I shall be keeping a note. Maybe my hero Satan is trying to tell me something.
Actually, what's the point of having them if we don't use them?
If I was PM I'd be pressing the button all the time. Probably have to put up some, like the bloody French and all their strikes, the Chinese and
their exploding phone chargers as they have nukes too
but plenty of targets that don't, Spanish sending their boats into Gibraltar waters, Argentines threatening
the Falklands, Jamaicans and their whinging about slavery, Nigeria and all the email fraud, Saudi Arabia and its promotion of Islamic
fundamentalism, the Scottish and their constant demands...
I'm compiling a list. Most government expenditure would be on new nukes.
Who cares about spending on welfare? I'd be nuking most horrible common people anyway.
Bah! The government will use them to spy on us. "You say you were at home watching TV when this crime was committed sir, but your
smart meter shows no significant electricity usage although it was cold and dark". CCTVs that read our number plates, phones that can be
tracked even when switched off. Have you checked that microchip in your dog? What does that really do I wonder?
Oh piss off!
Fed up with this crap! Jamaica is again
demanding compensation from the UK for the "lingering effects" of the Atlantic slave trade, abolished by Britain in 1807. Britain was also
a major driver for abolition of slavery by other nations.
A nation is not an object but a collection of people and this is simplistic nonsense. Most British people today, even if their ancestors were
actually British in the era of slavery, worked in conditions of near slavery themselves and got no profit from it while many Africans were
complicit in the slave trade, it could not have happened on anywhere near the
same scale otherwise. Not all Jamaicans today are descended from slaves either.
And what are these effects that are still "lingering" after more than 200 years? The list
here even includes hypertension and strokes. Actually those problems are
equally high in those from Africa whose ancestors were
never slaves and it's best addressed by cutting down on salt. Is promotion of a simple health message really beyond them as a result
of slavery? As for poor progress in education and lack of development where is any evidence that this is due to slavery?
These are problems you find in many nations. If the transatlantic slave trade had never existed and Africans had simply
migrated to the West Indies for paid jobs would it be any wealthier now? Looking at most sub Saharan African countries today, there is
not the slightest reason to think so.
Of course historical events can have effects for many decades, perhaps generations, but 200 years? Places like India,
Singapore, Malaysia etc have managed to emerge from empire to create successful economies. We in Europe have recovered from
immensely destructive wars within a decade.
Still, keep on blaming the evil white man for all your problems and trying to get money for nothing. Easier than getting off your arses
and shifting for yourselves.
Out on walk yesterday and got followed by a horse all the way across a field. Regularly I get followed by herds of sheep and
horses when I cross fields. On walk the day before I got adopted by a dog, lovely friendly little collie who kept jumping up at me and I
couldn't shake it off, followed me for ages. When I got to a minor road I flagged down a truck driver who slowed down for it and fortunately
he knew who it belonged to, otherwise I'd have had to take it home and then gone round sticking up notices. Even wierder, I have been
approached by small children three times in the last few months saying "hello, what's your name?" Haven't their parents told them
not to approach weird old blokes? I get waved at by babies. Then there was that strange thing a few months back when I got approached by a
group of 13 year old girls and one stood next to me and took a selfie.
Horses, sheep, dogs, kids, babies, young girls. They all seem to like xoggoth. Why can't I find a decent woman to do the same?
PS At least bloody cats stay clear of me.
Those bloody ghosts are everywhere you look!
Visited my nice nutty religious lady this weekend and stayed at the Talbot hotel in Oundle. It is supposed to be haunted
by the ghost of Mary Queen of Scots but she did not appear in my bed unfortunately.
Actually, the haunting tale is even more bollox than most haunting tales. For one thing, she had never actually been there in her life,
the haunting is supposed to be due to the "fact" that the staircase came from nearby Fotheringhay castle where she was executed.
For another, according to a historian I talked to in the bar, there is not the slightest evidence that it did.
Still, wouldn't it be interesting if ghosts did follow inanimate objects around? Would there be any lower size limit on those objects?
There's that old saying that every breath we take could contain atoms that were once breathed by Julius Caesar. What if every human
being decided to haunt one of the molecules from his/her last dying breath? Fuck me, we wouldn't be able to move for ghosts.
These generous people
The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has promised to
offer sanctuary to Syrian refugees at Lambeth Palace in
a four bedroom cottage in the grounds. Unless he intends to flout regulations that will be about 6 at most including kids.
We recently had a similar gesture from the Pope to house a whole two families in the Vatican.
Wow. Aren't these lovely people generous? A handful of people on the bishop's posh 13 acre estate and scarcely more in the Pope's
even more luxurious 110 acre nation. Lambeth Palace has a team of security guards, while the Vatican has its own small army.
Forgive me for being cynical but I'm betting these families will be pretty well vetted to ensure they won't be likely to cause any trouble anyway.
Many of the ordinary people of Europe, like all those "mean spirited" Daily Mail readers, are not quite so generous. But then that
is perhaps because they have to face problems that these generous elitist bastards never have to deal with. Huge numbers of unchecked
people in their locality changing its nature. People who refuse to mix and destroy community cohesion. People who use public services and
resources that they have never contributed to and reduce the availability for British citizens. Migrants of some origins also cause an
increase in crime and the area become less safe.
Perhaps before leading figures seek to "inspire" with their generosity they should look into the impacts of mass immigration, for whatever
reason, for others who are not as wealthy and privileged as they are.
PS Mind you, the bishop is right about one thing in that link. If we are going to take any refugees from Syria, let's take the Christians.
The Germans are insane
Well, their government is anyway. What are they thinking of
taking in such huge numbers from Syria? Gratitude rarely
lasts long in most human beings. Give out too much for too long and it turns to expectation. When those unrealistic hopes for a new life
don't materialise it turns to resentment. How long will it be before they, like the French who have taken in so many from Arab countries,
are landed with slum areas in once beautiful towns, with major terrorist acts and mass riots? Before they, like the similarly generous Swedes,
are having to tackle waves of crime in their major cities? How long before the EU open borders land us with them too?
The most sensible leader in Europe seems to be Hungary's. He has been realistic about the long term impact of many Muslims in our
predominantly Christian or secular EU nations and, if we are going to help genuine refugees and tackle this "migrant crisis" without
destroying our own societies, the only practical way idea is
his idea to fund temporary camps
in Muslim countries closer to the affected areas. We are wasting enormous mounts of money on ill directed foreign aid and diverting these
funds to support places like Turkey and Jordan would be a far better use.
On the plus side, it does make one (relatively) grateful that most of our
Muslims are from Pakistan or Bangladesh, they are not nearly as much of a problem, probably underepresented in major crime
in the South East, unlike Afro Carribeans and Africans and Eastern Europeans of some origins, and not generally inolved in riots for which
we mostly have to thank the Afro Carribeans. In my engineering and IT years I worked with a lot of them, excellent blokes. If we could only
kick out the extremist elements among them they could become a net positive like the Indians.
This case in Kentucky is absurd. If she is not
willing to do the job she is being paid to do then she could get the sack but there is no justification for a prison sentence. The US
seems to have largely lost its reputation as a nation of free speech.
All in favour of gay rights, what people do with their bumholes is up to them, but, provided we do not publicly promote views that
have a real adverse affect, governments should not be imposing on individuals. We should all have a personal
space, a right to our beliefs in our own lives, however unacceptable society may think them. Discrimination laws are probably
necessary but they should have limits, should not dictate who we have to allow into that personal space, for example
who we rent a room to in our own house, who we employ in a very small business. Within limits we should also be free to express
our views publicly.
How far is this imposition of society's views on individuals going to go? At the moment at least, there are sensibly
no rules regarding personal relationships and on dating websites one is allowed to state preferences regarding sex, sexuality, ethnicity,
age etc which it would probably be illegal to do if one was advertising a flatshare or a job, even if it was purely a one
to one position between the employer and the applicant.
Been using a dating site recently and I can still click "Seeking women". Will it stay that way? Maybe not. Too homophobic!
And far too one-sided
A factor that stirs up resentment is the one sided nature of action against discrimination. We see news items about
discrimination against blacks or Asians in renting or employment but the press never questions why ethnic shops or restaurants
are rarely seen to employ any who are not of the same ethnicity or sends undercover reporters to see if minority
employers/landlords are discriminating against whites. Such discrimination is actually not uncommon as
this BBC article indicates:
But in London at least you can find adverts specifying race openly displayed.
They only represent a small proportion of flat ads but it's hard to imagine even a single similar advert saying "whites only"
not drawing complaints.
But when contacted by the BBC, advertisers were taken aback to hear they might be breaking the law. A woman who placed a
"Filipino only" advert in a newsagent in Golders Green, north London, explains: "I'm sorry about that. All the people here are Filipino
so we need Filipinos."
An advertiser in Tooting, south London, seeking a "Muslim family" is disappointed that the law may not allow for religious preference.
"We are Muslim and it's a flatshare. What can I say? Everyone has his own preferences. OK?"
An advertiser in Perry Barr, Birmingham, who put an ad on Gumtree for a "student room (Asian females only)" defends the wording:
"We have done that because we are Asians and live in."
The idea that the law should dictate how landlords advertise a property is a step too far for some people.
"We've become too politically correct about these things," says Anil Bhanot, managing trustee of the Hindu Council UK.
"If people have choices let them."
To demand "Indian only" is a mistake, he says, but there is nothing negative about expressing a preference.
"It could be people are looking for someone with whom they have more common interests. It's not that they can't live with an English person."
We agree with Anil Bhanot's comment. Of course we all want to share our lives with people who have common interests, why should
we not be able to do so? That is not to say people of different ethnicities/sexualities/religions can't get on well but we are talking about taking in
someone we don't know at all here and the laws make it difficult to easily reverse a decision if there are significant divisions.
What we do object to is that only those from ethnic minorities are allowed to get away with it.
Got me worried now
I was looking at reports that Michelle Obummer is actually a bloke. Looking at the evidence, I'm not so sure this is just some baseless
right wing conspiracy theory after all. Not that I give a damn if he/she is or not, politicians could be houseflies or dung beetles for all I care, just as
long as they delivered sensible policies. Actually, if they were dung beetles, their policies would probably be much more
sensible. Nice little turd-munching creatures would probably not embrace impractical and unworkable ideals in the way that people,
especially liberal lefties like Obummer, tend to do.
More importantly, one of the criteria has really got me worried. Men have ring fingers longer than index fingers apparently. While that
is clearly so on my right hand, it isn't on my left hand. My left index finger may be very slightly longer! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!
Maybe I'm a man on the right and a woman on the left. Sure my left bollock is a bit smaller too.
Oh well. Too late to have a gender realignment at my age. I will just have to be sure that any "women" I meet from now on
have short right index fingers and long left ones. Then my male half can bonk her female half and her male half can bonk my female
half and no perviness will be involved.
Hang on a mo! If I am in normal sexual position facing her, her male bits will be opposite my male bits, so obviously we will
always have to do it doggy fashion to avoid any perviness.
Wait! That sounds a bit pervy too! I don't want anything to do with perviness. I'll just walk down to the nearby pig farm and find myself
a nice sow.
Wasn't sure from emails/texts after first meeting, but the lovely new lady says she's rather keen. Spent all afternon together
and did not run out of bollux to talk about. Nice liitle doggy too. Day planned on Friday, if the weather is a bit less shitty.
Asylum rules needs urgent revision
We sympathise with people fleeing to Europe from Syria; if me and my family (well, me anyway!) were at risk of being
killed we would probably do the same thing. The problem is the existing asylum principles which were set up long ago in an era before mass
transportation and the evolution in Europe of an excessive form of liberalism that elevates one individual's human rights over the common
good and the rights of others and disdains the idea of a common national culture.
While many who claim asylum may have good reason to do so, many, probably the great majority over longer periods, do not. They are
economic migrants or those escaping from problems, such as criminals or localised tensions, that could be solved by relocation within their own
countries or which should be the responsibility of their own governments. Sure, there are major problems due to extremists
in parts of Nigeria or Pakistan but why they should be entitled to asylum? We would not have expected people in Northern Ireland to
claim asylum elsewhere during the height of the troubles. What's the difference?
We cannot go on allowing mass migration in this way; we are simply importing the seeds of all the same problems
into our own nations. Conflicts and tensions in those problem countries exist for one reason, because people of different groups,
whether defined by ethnicity, politics, tribe or religion, are living side by side with incompatible ideas. It will be no different when they are
living here with beliefs and attitude that have no compatibility with our own or indeed with those of other minorities. Immigration over the last
70 years has given us most of the major riots and some, like the Birmingham riots, pitted one minority ethnic group against another. If they
cannot reach accomodation and live peacefully with others in their own countries, why should they do so here? There is now
a steady rise in tensions over mass migration which does not bode well for the stability of Europe. No Neo-Nazi protests in the UK
like those we have seen in Germany so far but most are enormously concerned about what is happening and any who think it is only Daily Mail
readers should try reading online comments for the The Guardian or The Independant.
Maybe, before they just continue to tinker at the edges of the problem, our leaders should ask themselves how this is ever going to stop.
It isn't. The more we take in, the greater the draw there will be for others who will naturally prefer to go where they can be with others of their
own cultures. If emigration is the easiest option, and even spending months travelling is a lot easier than working for years to
better themselves and improve their own economies, more and more will do it. There are long term factors at work that will increase
the pull of the currently more prosperous nations, including possible climate change causing more drought in Sub Saharan Africa,
the growth of Islamic extremism, the slowdown in the Chinese economy that will destroy the recent improvements in Sub Sharan economies,
and migration itself. Taking away the youngest and fittest will drag down the economies of the nations they are leaving until even the not so
young and fit will want to escape. Anyone who thinks this will be yesterday's news in a year or two if the war in Syria ends is living in a dream
We need much tougher rules and these should be a minimum:
Allow asylum applications only from a defined list of countries. The list would only include:-
a) Those where there are major wars and conflicts that put residents throughout the entire nation at risk, where there are no safe areas and no
effective authorites to whom they can go for help or b) those in lands with repressive governments where persecution is unavoidable, on basis of
ethnicity or religion for example. We should not have to protect people if they can avoid problems by simply keeping their heads down and
avoiding actions the authorities disapprove of, like taking part in political protests or being openly gay.
The conditions for asylum should be sharply defined, even for those from nations on the list. Conflicts involve two or more sides and
we should not take activists from any groups, like extremist Islamists, or members of those repressive governments, who have any
responsibility for creating the problem. Neither should we take any, those with a serious criminal background for example, who put our
own citizens at risk. Our own citizens should always come first and any asylum seeker involved in major crime or repeated minor criminality
after entry to Europe should be returned without consideration of their fate.
The validity of a claim should be considered impartially and a decision, unless a new reason arises or major new evidence emerges,
should be final. There should not be everlasting appeals, involving expensive lawyers and translators funded by British taxpayers, to keep
going over the same details. If they have a good case for asylum they should be able to present it on first application and not require coaching
and embelishment to improve their case.
Required proof should normally include proper documentation to show that the claimants are from the country they claim to be from.
We should not put up with the widespread dishonest practice of migrants throwing away documents so they cannot be sent back. Why would
genuine claimants not keep documents that prove they are from an unsafe country? Lack of documents should normally be cause for
rejecting an application for asylum. In the rare cases where a loss appears to be genuine there should be rigorous interviewing to
ensure their origin is what they claim it to be. If unsuccessful applicants cannot immediately be returned due to lack of documentation then
there should be indefinite detention until they can. The length of such detention will depend on their cooperation.
Asylum should be on a temporary basis for a defined period and not be grounds for permanent residence. If the grounds for asylum
cease to exist within that period, if the war is over or conditions otherwise improve, they should be returned.
If an asylum seeker is granted residence the rules regarding marriage partners and family should not create an open door for future
immigration. Any wishing to join them should be required to apply for visas, residence or citizenship on the basis of their own qualities
and prove that they will not be a burden on, and will preferably an asset to, the British population.
Went for a date yesterday and was waiting in town not far from Brighton (the UK's San Francisco) when this "lady" came up and stood
close by looking at her phone. I kid you not, "she" must have been over 6' 4" tall, mini skirt with muscly legs, man's craggy face with bright
red lipstick from halfway down "her" chin to just under "her" nose. Perhaps "she" was a pantomime dame off to rehearsal? Surely real cross
dressers would make a bit more effort to look like a woman? Was tempted to take photo on phone but if "she" had seen me "she" could have
kicked the crap out of me. Not even sure Hulk Hogan in his younger days would have emerged unscathed.
Very tempted to get one of
these and record some of the oddities of human nature.
PS Date turned out to be Eastern European with fake name. However, the one the day before was very promising. Another meeting
Windows 10 is out. We at bloggoth do love free things but will set it up on our spare PC first to see what it's like. Apparently it
has a female voice thing called Cortana that responds to your spoken requests, such as "search for...", "play my music" or "tell me
Sounds good, although obviously we at bloggoth are hoping for further development. The technology is there.
PS What? No sucking off device yet? Come on you PC gadget makers, if you can make USB toy robots and catapaults, a basic sucking
off device should be a doddle.
Katies Hopkins. A hate crime? Or maybe she just hates crime
Even when there are significant problems of low performance, crime or extremism among an ethnic group, prominent and
influentual figures need to be careful of language. Raising predudice against all of them increases the problems by making life harder
for those who are able, law abiding and willing to integrate.
But why should we so cautious when talking about totally unnaceptable behaviour? The migrants swarming into Europe are
a just a bunch of people engaging in illegal activity which causes us enormous problems. They
threaten and intimidate drivers, damage lorries and cause enormous amounts of foodstuffs and other goods to be thrown away by crapping
and pissing all over them. This damage and the recurring holdups are having a huge adverse impact on our economy. In other parts of
Europe the effects on residents are even worse. The migrants may be understandably desperate but many criminals are desperate too
or are only what they are due to an appalling upbringing, yet we don't hear constant defences of their behaviour.
To those who say let them in, we suggest they should have some sympathy for the European citizens whose lives are greatly impacted
by this influx. The enormous burden falls on our own tax paying citizens who are themselves denied NHS treatments or other state services
on cost grounds. They have more difficulty getting on the housing ladder or finding school places for their kids and then see them held back as
schools struggle with numerous languages in the classroom. They can no longer rely on police turning up when they are burgled yet see time
spent tackling migrant problems like FMG or forced marriage. Worst of all is
the huge increase in crime that migrants, mostly young males, always bring to the host society.
Don't our young women who end up being raped or our old people who get mugged matter?
It's a pity that poverty, repression and conflicts exist but with 6bn people in the world there are always going to be very many affected by
them. We can't keep taking responsibility for world problems at the expense of our own nation and its people.
Katie Hopkin's comments cannot be "racial hatred" as she was not attacking a racial group, just a disparate group of people of various
races, religions and national origins who are engaged, however understandably, in criminal activity. Many would agree with her.
Naturally we at bloggoth do not, it is an insult to nice little cockcroaches. Parasites is a more accurate expression.
One example, Eritreans in Lambeth. They have large families,
80% are in social housing, just 36% are in work, 21% can't speak English and 7% have special care or support needs - more than twice the figure
for the elderly in the UK. The performance of Somalis in the UK
is even worse.
Who is paying for that? The definition of parasite is "an organism which lives in or on another organism and benefits
by deriving nutrients at the other's expense". You can call it racist if you like but the term is accurate.
All asylum seekers? Garbage.
Many migrants are not from nations with major problems anyway. Just today
police stopped a lorry with 18 illegals from Vietnam.
Why should those from a stable nation with one of the world's fastest growing economies have any case for asylum? Vietnam and China
are not democracies but many of their citizens who put their minds to it can do very well. Chinese are now among the highest spending tourists
in the UK.
And, yet again, it was an Eastern European driver who was knowingly assisting them. Migrants, even those here legally, often have no loyalty to
our nation. They put their own countrymen first, most illegals found working are in businesses run by those of the same ethnicity, or are willing to
help other illegals for a suitable fee.
PS By the way, PC BBC, these are illegals, not "suspected illegals" or illegals in inverted commas - legal migrants come
through proper channnels with passports and visas, not hidden in the backs of lorries!
In Berlin, young male immigrants are three times more likely to commit violent crimes than their German peers. It's a similar story across
Europe, but government efforts to find a solution vary across the Continent.
Hmmm. Maybe the roots of immigrant crime are immigrants. Maybe the solution is less immigrants. Or is that too simple?
Real crime news
Following a lot of reports about attacks by seagulls there's
a new theory
There’s no doubt that seagull attacks are on the rise. Or at least, reports of seagull attacks are on the rise, which amounts to much the
But now there comes a third theory. And it’s the most bonkers yet. The gulls are ‘drunk’ on flying ants.
Odd coincidence as was walking down my garden path earlier and some ants were swarming at edge of the lawn. A young sparrow
was having a feast. Will I get attacked by sparrows tomorrow?
PS Hitchcock's "The Birds" was the crappiest comedy film I ever saw. Would have been much funnier if people were being torn to bits
by Sparrows or Blue Tits.
PPS Why is it that the evil birds in horror films are always crows? Is it 'cos they is black? Boo! Institutional racism!
More beetle porn
xoggoth.org had thousands of emails asking for more hard core Soldier Beetle porn and we are sure everyone will like this one.
A Soldier Beetle threesome! Who said perversion is just a human thing?
I need a sex change 2. Or maybe not.
Just got a "real" message, ie not just one of those general things sent to everyone, from a lady nearby. Cor! For somebody
just a couple of years younger than me she's bleeding gorgeous! Assuming it's a real and up to date photo of course. Replied.
Lets' hope I don't screw this one up. Saying I'm a Satanist is not a good idea on these things. I'm learning.
PS And a bloke on a free dating site (got my gender right on that one) who sent me a message before has just viewed my profile again.
His profile says he's looking for women! Do I look like a woman? Hmmmm. Maybe It's time to get my hair cut.
PPS And a breast reduction.
PPPS Oh sod it! Look, you can't be fussy at my age. Got lots of savings I don't spend, so tomorrow I will phone a private surgeon
and have bits fitted to suit every eventuality, huge tits, fanny, couple of extra arseholes. Maybe a cock enlargement won't go amiss,
not everyone I meet on these sites will bring a magnifying glass.
Darn it. I need a sex change
Thinking of joining one of those "mature" dating sites again now I'm losing my nice wierd lady so signed in to the free account without adding
any details just to see if it was worth paying for. Aaagh! Search brought up all males looking for females!
Must have missed the sex/sexual preferences selection when I signed up but that should surely be easy to correct on the "personal details" page?
Nope! Email and password are only things one can alter.
Just got a message from a nearby John. Any chance he's really a woman who can't correct his details either?
PS. Bloody Hell! Another bloke just viewed my profile! Bet I won't get that level of interest from females.
PPS. These sites must be very complicated for any trannies who "swing both ways".
PPPS. Where is the "Looking for pigs" option?
Employing people? That's not what employment is for!
What a bunch of utter wankers some of our unions are. Unite, Unison (sorry Rosie) but especially the transport unions RMT and ASLEF.
Their main priority is to preserve their elevated and sometimes totally undeserved pay and conditions. These
self serving bastards always pretend that the interests and safety of the public is their major concern but they never seem to give a damn about
how their strikes and other actions affect that same public.
London tube strikes have been a regular problem in recent years although London tube workers are among the most overpaid bunch of
workers wankers in the UK. Just four years ago
they secured a deal that will see drivers' annual pay rise to £52,000 this year. Now the already overpaid bastards
are demanding even more, a four day week, lots of extra pay and quality time off in return for the 24 hour weekend tube service.
Some (ie the union lefties) argue that their high pay is deserved as a driver has the safety of hundreds of people in his hands.
This is simplistic nonsense. Pay should not be simply about potential risks but the level of skills and judgement needed to avoid them. On the
great majority of tube trains very little is required as they use automatic
signals to drive and stop themselves. The driver can override them in an emergency but otherwise all he does is give out public
announcements and decide when to close the doors and leave the station. Hardly requires years of training and an IQ of 150.
Perhaps the low level of
skills needed is best illustrated by the fact that,
on the Copenhagen Metro, which has an excellent safety record, all of these things are taken care of by automated systems, they don't use
drivers at all. The London tube already has many of the same automatic safety features. If we could ditch all these drivers we could invest
the money we pay them to provide a Copenhagen type system and be a lot better off.
A union representing Tube staff has suspended
talks aimed at averting another strike after raising an "emergency" safety issue. The RMT said Transport for London (TfL) was "winging it"
by allowing untrained staff to direct trains out of depots.
Geoff Martin from the union said: "Seeing the trains out of the depot is an incredibly skilled job. They have an air traffic control system to get
them out and it requires years and years of training and certification.
Oh really? It takes years of training to direct a train out of a depot does it? Gee! What does one have to do? Check the board to ensure
there is not another train approaching before it joins the main track? Ensure that, er, um, er. Actually, we can't think of anything else.
We admit we are not experts in train depot operation but let's compare with something he mentioned, Air Traffic Control. Training an
air traffic controller
takes between 7 and 11 months,
not "years and years". Are we seriously expected to believe that directing a train onto a main line requires far more expertise and judgement than landing
a plane at a busy airport?
This is typical of the way that these union parasites try to con the public about the importance of jobs which actually serve no bloody
purpose whatosever. They rip the public off while pretending to protect their interests and hold us back from technological advances
that would deliver cheaper solutions and serve us all far better. They are the Luddites of the 21st century.
A major flaw of the leftist mentality is the idea that the main purpose of employment is to employ. No, it isn't. The main purpose
should be provision of a necessary product or service that society or individuals need and are prepared to pay for.
Why does it have to be a face? We at bloggoth would much prefer to have a huge arse on our notes. We did think of Kim
Cardashian but it can′t be someone still alive. Arses must shrivel up a bit after a few years in a coffin so maybe it needs to be
somebody with an even bigger one than Kim to start with. How about
this lady? Not just a huge arse but, being black and female, she′s ideal for today′s inclusiveness obsession too.
Candidates are supposed to be involved in the visual arts too, but I can't think of any better visual art than a huge arse myself.
That's stretching it a bit? Mmmm yeh!
could face jail terms of up to 10 years under plans being considered by the government. About time. If you burgle a commercial
premises you can be liable to up to 10 years in prison, 14 years for a dwelling.
Of course it is far more complex issue. You know well enough when you are breaking into a house but it is often unclear online whether
something is illegal or not. There is contradictory advice on legality of downloading a video from Youtube for personal use for example.
You can also download things from a site that appears to grant permission without being aware that the site owner has no right to grant it.
But when there is a clear criminal intent, when people are doing it on a major scale for commercial gain, we need to get
with the modern age. When cyber property can be
worth at least as much as physical property it makes no sense to have a lower maximum sentence for theft of it.
More Giant Hogweed related pictures
How boring! Cry the non existent readers! Ah, but wait until the end, there is something really worthwhile!
The caterpillars are already there. What they are doing to the poor Hogweed ain't nice
Went walking today and Hogweed is everwhere and covered in Soldier Beetles. They love it!
And each other. Where else can you get good quality Soldier Beetle porn?
PS High resolution photos available on request
Where can I get one?
Google's driverless cars are
in the news again. Never mind driverless cars, I want a driverless van.
Went for a 1hr 40m walk the other day, did some running too and was quite knackered when I got back to the van. Would be nice sometimes
when I overstretch myself or get lost to get out my phone and say "Hello little vanny, can you come and pick me up please". Obviously he will
need to know where I am, so maybe Google can equip him with proper Sherlock type intelligence. All I have to say is
"Er, um, well, there's a layby in a small road, just opposite an open field with a tree in the middle. There's some Giant Hogweed by the verge"
and my little van will reply "Ok, xoggoth, be with you in 6 minutes, 32.4 seconds"
PS I hope
More hysteria - update
Beats me why they can't get rid of the Giant Hogweed anyway, given that there is a pest that will totally destroy it before it seeds.
The largest one in our garden, coming into flower just a week ago, is now a dead husk. The eggs are all over the shrivelled leaves
and in a couple of weeks they will be covered in large black and yellow caterpillars. Thought I had a previous photo of them but can't find it.
Never mind, will get some more soon.
Racist to foreign plants
How come everyone can say the truth about the problems caused by invasive foreign plants but we must never say the same
thing about the far more damaging effects of some human immigrants? The old lady at my writer's club who got fleeced out of £40k
says the bloke who took her card had a foreign accent. Another who had her purse stolen in a charity shop also said the perpetrators
were ethnic/foreign and says the police mentioned it was common. In crime pages of the online newspapers, some ethnic minorities,
especially black, and foreign names are almost always overrepresented and crime statistics paint the same picture.
Maybe time our governments started acting on the realities of those from poor and third world countries. If we take in people from
nations with major problems then, without proper stringent checks on individuals, we are going to get those same problems in the UK.
Even the liberal left cannot blame unacceptable beliefs and practices like witchcraft, FGM, honour killings, the caste system or forced
marriage on racism and exclusion but other more general problems, like low performance, criminality and corruption are no different.
Good or bad, migrants reflect the traits of the societies they come from.
Today we see more and more African names on the crime pages. This is entirely predictable. To take just one example, look at the
Foreign Office travel advice for Kenya, one of Sub Saharan Africa's better
"Bag snatching is common in transport hubs like bus stations, railway stations and airports. Mugging, kidnapping, car-jacking and
armed robbery occur regularly, particularly in Nairobi, Mombasa and other large cities." Nothing unusual there, street
crime in many African nations is even worse. If someone has made a living snatching bags, are they going to stop doing it the moment
they cross our borders?
Enoch Powell got a lot of flack nearly 50 years ago for his comments on immigration and, while the problems
have not proved as severe as he said, no "rivers of blood" so far, the facts show that some minorities have not been a net asset.
A less provocative manner may be needed but the government should be using those facts to shape future policy.
Of course they will not. They just keep on repeating the errors of the past.
Topic: Racist to foreign plants
Comments so far:
First it was Japanese Knotweed, a very slow spreading plant that is as easy as pie to eradicate (just puil out any shoot you see
for three years and make sure they go on the bonfire, no weedkiller needed) and now it's
True enough, it does spread quickly but whether it is "Exceedingly dangerous...without a shadow of a doubt, the most dangerous plant in
Britain" is open to question. Got quite a lot in my little wild bit of garden and have had for a few years and so far my hands have not dropped off.
As for the idea that it can grow up to six metres (20ft) tall! As a nature obsessive I spend my time looking at wild flowers and have yet to
see one reach even six feet. By far the tallest wild flowers are Thistles.
Mind you, this is The Daily Express. Better start preparing for next week's hurricane that will kill millions.
Let's get out
We at bloggoth have no problem with what is supposed to be the core principle of the EU. What's not to like about moving towards
towards a union with other advanced economies like France, Germany, Denmark, Sweden or Belgium. Even the poorer countries like
Portugal or Greece never caused us any real problem before the Euro disasters, we do not have major cultural differences with any of
them and it was a pretty reciprocal arrangement.
Then we rushed to let in Eastern Europe with whom there is no recipricocity at all. The huge expansion of population alone
is causing us all sort of problems, on top of which we have to deal with beggars, rough sleepers and criminals from the likes of Romania,
Bulgaria and Lithuania, plus even more illegals from outside Europe who are helped by the EU's porous borders. How long will it be before
we open the door to the criminal cesspit of Albania or Muslim Turkey and totally destroy what is left of our cultures?
There is no democracy in this European dictatorship. Our lords and masters totally ignore the effects of this inrush on our working
populations, like the increased difficulty in finding jobs or affordable housing, the overcrowded roads and public transport or the
neighbourhoods where separate communities live side by side in isolation from each other. Actually consulting their electorates
on EU measures is a no no, and on the rare occasions where referenda have been held the electorate has been obliged to hold
more until they get it "right" as defined by our overlords.
In terms of power it is the EU commission that has the most. It is responsible for proposing legislation in the
interests of the European Union, not the interests of the individual countries that form the EU or their citizens. Some argue that
that this is democratic since the president and commission members must be approved by the European council, made up of
elected heads of state, and the elected European parliament. But if the important decisions are removed from the people, when
their opinions are not even considered and those at the top only need to curry favour and make deals with those at the next lowest level
to obtain and retain power, it is not democracy at all. Seriously, if the voters in the UK or any other nation had no idea who would be PM
or president when they voted at elections, if people they had never even heard were simply appointed after the event by deals between
elected politiicians, would we call it democracy?
The EU produces enormous numbers of detailed laws, at enormous cost, which simply duplicate or override perfectly adequate
laws that nations already have, which take no account of national problems, needs and priorities and
which serve no obvious purpose other than to employ overpaid EÚ civil servants and serve the OCD obsession of a drive to create
one Europe and to harmonise for the sake of it. Many EU laws such as providing for common workplace safety standards and product quality,
tackling international crime or dealing with spread of livestock diseases, do make sense but some are plain lunatic. Take
this example. The EU apparently thought it necessary to legislate on switchover from analogue to digital TV. Given that all the nations
have different languages and cultures and there is almost no crossover of programs between them, what does that acheive? If one nation did not
acheive the target how would it affect the others? Other laws on issues such as foreign aid or human rights should only be decided by elected
national governments. Their citizens voted for them and their citizens pay the taxes that fund these laws. It is their safety and needs that
should come first.
Bank at Barclays
The DM reports that
Barclays is giving names to its cash machines. Naturally, as a Hyperanthropomorph, we at bloggoth totally approve. After getting some
cash out we always say "Thanks little cash machine". Those little cash machines work hard and I bet that, apart from we at bloggoth,
nobody ever acknowledged their efforts. Maybe giving them names will make others appreciate them a bit more.
It seems nobody else has grasped the lessons of the Terminator films. Perhaps these machines were so malignant because we
treated their kind with contempt for so long.
PS Mind you, we are not so polite to those f* overpriced parking meters in our local town.
Inanimate objects don't have feelings do they?
We have a crappy little collection of ornaments on our bedroom window sill. Some are recent acquisitions while others have an
important place in our life. The ebony elephant and tortoise were both purchased in Cape Town in 1972 on route to Oz. Sent the former
to the missus with letter "reminds me of you" and she was always called Phunty after that. The elephant at left was purchased in Kuala Lumpur
a few years later on way back from a business trip in days when my job was often more interesting than just sitting in front of a computer.
Think the two cheap little tortoises found in the shed were my kids' toys.
They were all equally spaced and facing forward but I am always bonking them when I pull down the blackout blinds so they get moved
about and the results are very odd. All the elephants at left have turned to face each other and moved in close like a family,
the tortoises at middle have also moved together for a natter and been joined by ebony elephant who is ebony tortoise's old SA friend,
while the two at right have edged close like mum and hatchling.
In the top picture the ebony elephant was clearly slightly distracted from his old tortoise friend's conversation by the female elephant's bottom.
The lower picture shows a couple of day's bonkings later and movements are small but significant. He has clearly given up pretending
to listen and is considering making his move. How will my Kuala Lumpur elephant react to these designs on his village fair brought missus?
It make take some weeks but we will see.
Karma not calmer
You are supposed to be over a death after about 2 years but not there yet. Still have some very low days.
Read all the crap about what is supposed to help. Socialising - had some company Friday and it did not help at all, could not wait to be alone
with a vodka. Keeping busy - yesterday I drove myself to tidy the garden and do various other things that I enjoy when feeling ok
but that did not help either.
Started same today. Curtains in the lounge had fallen down and due to the steel lintel over the window I could not make the hole
any deeper and first effort was a failure. They fell down again and knocked the clock off the fireplace mantel. Went ballistic! "Fuck, shit, arse,
wank, cunt, bollox, balls, piss..." Turned it into a constant chant for the next 15 minutes until I'd finished the "Fuck, shit...." job .
I feel much better now! My lord Satan is obviously pleased with me. Actually, maybe a release of anger is a proper cure. Not just swearing,
maybe all those "motiveless" mass killers you read about feel fantastic afterwards.
Not quite loony enough to slaughter people just for belonging to a group and a bit too old to go to Syria and shoot ISIS fanatics.
On the other hand, I could have great fun targetting local people who really annoy me. Let's see, the neighbours who start up their bloody motor
mowers or strimmers just as soon as I relax in the garden, that squealy little girl up the road, the owners of that yappy little dog, the stupid Green
local councillor who is always complaining about everything, the owners of all the f* cats who keep crapping on my lawn and flattening my plants,
the idiots who park in the middle of a space big enough for two cars so my son can't park outside the house, the local works
whose lorries make a loud noise every time they reverse and whose CCTV blocks out a channel of mine, the bloody steam railway with
its whistles... I will make a full list. Where can I get a Kalashnikov?
PS I initially mispelt this as Kalma. She is a Finnish god of death and decay who smells of corpses apparently. Familiar with Norse mythology
but Finnish mythology seems different. Must have a look. After my curtain rant I do suddenly feel interested in things again.
PPS And cyclists! And bastards who chuck litter on MY nice countryside... The list will grow. I have ordered my Kalashnikov
from Amazon. Just you wait you bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Got my new BT Home Hub 5 all set up in preparation for the new faster "infinity" Broadband service. All pretty easy, Windows and
BT do most of the job for you. The BT pages presented on startup have a few options, click, click and you're there.
One of them is to o set up Parental Controls. Of course I clicked no, #1 son living at home is 33, so it's
up to him what he looks at online.
Then I set up two spare PCs and this option came up every time. Hang on a minute! That means that when #1 son started up his PC
he would have got the same options. What did he click for parental controls? We assume it is for parents controlling what their underage children
can access online but equally it could mean adult children controlling what their senile old parents can view.
Maybe he will fear that all my wanking over illegal pig porn will give me a heart attack and turn them on.
Over and over again
On TV, online or the printed press, when the BBC or others interview these F* illegals trying to sneak into Britain we hear the same
things said over and over again. This one's
comments in the DT are so typical it is almost like they are rehearsed:
Abdul Aziz, from Sudan, slipped out from underneath a truck at Toddington services on the M1 in Bedfordshire, and said: “England is good.”
After risking his life clinging to the lorry’s chassis during a journey from the Eurotunnel terminal at Folkestone, Kent, to the truck’s first stop at
the service station, he said: "I love London, the people."
"I am a student and I want to learn. I want to go to university,” said the 22-year-old in broken English.
Yeh right! He wants to go to one of our universities to learn and who's going to pay for that? Not him I daresay. I suppose we should
be grateful for the modesty of his ambitions at our expense. Only a week or two ago, another African interviewed on the BBC TV news was
saying he wanted to go to Oxford. So much for the liberal/lefty idea that they only come to get jobs and work hard. Then there's all this stuff
about England being so friendly, so tolerant compared to the likes of France or Germany. According to
a poll of "refugees" in 2010 they are right and that's our big problem.
Tolerance within reason is a good thing but we have taken it into the regions of idiocy by being tolerant of those
who take advantage of our generosity, who are a burden, who threaten our safety or are not prepared to be tolerant of us in return.
Maybe we need to get a damn site nastier! The government should not be considering applications for asylum or leave to remain
from any coming from or via safe countries and should be confining these illegals in the most basic accomodation until such time as they
are sent back. We should not provide or allow provision of any health, housing, translation,advice or other services to illegals, including by
charities, and should get really tough on those knowingly employing or housing them.
It seems that the arrest of General Karake, under a EUROPEAN arrest warrant initiated by a SPANISH judge
for alleged war crimes is endangering UK-Rwanda relations
according to the BBC.
Oh dear! Mustn't jeopardize relations with an important trading partner like Rwanda must we? Why, that might lose the UK
economy as much as , er, minus £66 million a year that we give them in foreign aid, dispersed via
We could be wrong of course, a quick Google does not always reveals the full truth as these issues are not simple and people
may distort the truth to suit their political agendas. A commonly accepted study (Dollar and Burnside) indicates that foreign aid is 50%
effective in improving gross domestic product in well managed countries but has little effect in poorly managed ones. On the other hand,
another working with the same
data provide no support for the idea that aid works even in "a good policy environment" either. Rwanda's economy does seem to be
improving but there is no proof that that is connected to foreign aid.
So come on Camoron. If you must chuck away 0.7% of UK GDP on aid to third world countries, how about some openess?
Why not set up proper independent monitoring schemes and tell us in detail what the amount given to each country has acheived?
If you can show that all the billions chucked at these nations actually improves their economies significantly and may similarly reduce the
numbers of useless migrants illegals who burden the nations of Europe then even righties like we at bloggoth might support it.
Update. The power of bloggoth - 2
Just below the previous post that bastards who target old or vulnerable people should get increased sentences we reported
the next day that new guidelines are to be introduced to do just that.
Our next post must be about government provision of free prostitutes for wierd old blokes. We can't wait until tomorrow.
Turned up to meet the great old ladies at at my writer's club on Friday and was appalled to hear that one had just had
£50,000 stolen from her deposit account after her debit card was stolen during a distraction theft in town. Not quite sure
how that gave them access to her deposit account but I'm relaying what she said and she certainly isn't senile. Others at the
group have lost money and valuables to pickpockets in town. They hang around the charity shops apparently targetting older people who
are easy pickings. Astonishingly, I can find no reports of these things in the local press.
Much worse things happen to the elderly. Cases of street robberies, burglaries, online scams, frauds by rogue builders etc
are commonplace in the crime news. It is often reported they are targeted because they are easy pickings. My wife's grandmother
had been fit and active but went downhill and died very quickly, just like
this woman, after she was mugged in the street.
Sure we are on their old fart list. We regularly get cold calls from f* Indians called Peter or Jane etc trying to tell us they are from Microsoft
calling about a fault on our computer. Fortunately we have spent most of our life in IT and are not likely to fall for that crap until we are
Others are not so lucky and some are scammed out of much more than £121.
Maybe they should make it a particular offence to target elderly or other vulnerable people and put these scumbags away
for a lot longer.
These items were in the local newspapers just today:
There you are! It now takes less than half a day for our governments to take note of bloggoth wisdom!
And another case
Today also has
a story of an elderly couple being conned. The judge warns of naivety of the elderly. He isn't wrong. Look at the pictures of
the crooks, especially the bloke. Maybe poor eyesight is a factor too. How can anyone who looks like that not be a crook?
What mass immigration really gives us
In economic terms nothing at all. Said it all before, but if you expand GDP by x% and population by x% or more, nobody
is any richer. There are some generally useful groups like the Chinese, Indians, Poles or Hungarians but their positive input is more
than outweighed by the negative effects of other low performing groups whose most notable contributions have been gangs, terrorism
and riots. As for the wonders of cultural diversity, they might indeed be wonderful if they did not include rejection of our major values and
practices like FGM, honour killing and forced marriage. The measurable negative impact on resources such as schools, roads and infrastructure
is huge. Some things, like the loss of social cohesion, are not easily measured but are certainly negative.
For me, the worst thing is the destruction of our country in the literal sense. Google "development 500 homes planning" and you see
major developments planned all over the country to meet increased demand due to expansion of the population, 84% *Note
of which is down to immigration. Not far from me a 500 home development has been approved which will
effectively make a local village into part of the nearby town. In and around our own small village there are plans for up to 55 new dwellings
which will ruin what are now pleasant wooded areas and a small pond.
Green belts are being built on all over the country but it isn't just loss of green belts that is a problem. "Brownfield" sites are not
all horrible polluted muddy areas covered in rubbish or derelict buildings. They are often pleasant, sometimes beautiful, spaces with
grass or wild flowers that add character and give a sense of space to the towns and villages around them. So many pleasant little areas
have vanished beneath new developments around here.
Topic: What mass immigration really gives us
Comments so far:
Replace God with Bill Gates
It wasn't half as much of a hastle as I had feared getting my new PC as I wanted it and some things were remarkably easy.
My ancient printer didn't work today when I wanted to print a footpath map but then I noticed the little "Solve PC issues" icon
on the taskbar had a message about a printer driver, clicked on that, brief install and it was ok.
Pity we can't solve all the problems of humanity, cancer, disease, insanity etc quite so easily. Clearly the software that god
installed in living things is not a patch on Microsoft's. If there are bugs or vulnerabilities in software, the major companies will
soon issue an update to sort the problem. On the other hand, living things have to wait umpteen milllions of years for
evolution to sort out their defects. Ok, I know that computers are nowhere near as complex as mammals but, after all,
we have only been working on them a few decades, god has been messing around for billions of years. Give Bill Gates a few billion
years and just think what we could have by now!
How about some reprogramming options? That would be good. Instead of being stuck with the personality that genetics
and upbringing gave us, why can't we just pick up a remote control and select whatever character we would like to be?
Be wary of statistics that "prove" racism
The Guardian recently reported that
Black Americans killed by police are twice as likely are to be unarmed as white people. No reason to doubt the basic figures
but is that headline really the relevant one, given higher black involvement in violent crime, especially
gun crime? Why should law abiding people, of whatever race, who are never involved in any sort of encounters with the police
figure in these statistics? Including them makes as much sense as including dolphins.
Surely the number of unarmed people of each race who are killed by police should be weighed against the number who
are actually involved in potentially violent encounters with the police? Calculate in that more meaningful way and the figures
look very different. According to the Washington Times:
adjusted to take into account the racial breakdown in violent crime, the data actually show that police are less likely to kill black suspects
than white ones.
“Adjusted for the homicide rate, whites are 1.7 times more likely than blacks die at the hands of police,” he said. “Adjusted for the racial
disparity at which police are feloniously killed, whites are 1.3 times more likely than blacks to die at the hands of police.”
We can't find it now, (damn PC packed up and we lost the note) but another UK article indicated it is not entirely accurate to represent
this solely as a racist white policeman vs black suspect scenario either, because black policeman were also more likely to shoot black
suspects. That indicates it is also about police perception of danger.
Maybe before people blame problems in London on "institutional racism" they should look at where a disproportionate percentage
of violent crime, especially gun-related crime, comes from.
My PC packed up some days ago so got a new one. Taking ages to set it all up as I like. When you are OCD that's hard,
it's not just getting all the essential programs (like F* Microsoft Office!) to work. When you are OCD, like we at
xoggoth, each desktop icon must be exactly in the right position. A few pixels over, no way!
PS And hyperanthropomorphic too. Mustn't remove an icon unless I absolutely have to, the poor little thing would
feel unwanted sitting all alone in the dark on an unused disc.
PPS Wonder if Feng Shui applies to desktops?
PPS We have installed our bloggoth app which will automatically provide a regular posting of bollux on here with no
effort on our part. Randomly generated words are filtered against a list to reduce those which are not swearwords,
obsessions with bottoms or rants about horrible foreign/common/lefty people.
Sneaking into holes
At least the lovely green countryside is back and not too squelchy. Went walking from home for over an hour and a
half yesterday. (OCD note: 1h 37m 25s according to my little pedometer) Probably threw away some of the physical
benefit due to fags and vodka with my drinky neighbour when I got back but not the mental uplift of looking at all
those meadows and trees and wild flowers.
Lots of footpaths round here but another nice thing is all the woods, fields and open spaces that,
while they are presumably owned by somebody, do not have any fences or signs. Of late, having done all the footpaths
and main spaces, I have taken to exploring all the little gaps created by animals even when the unfenced area they
lead into appears very small. Amazing what you can discover. Sometimes just litter. Other times, as with this one just
off the road, a fantastic view over the hills.
The lord is displeased
A few hundred yards from that Opus Dei place there was a remarkable incident during last week's thunderstorms.
Heard reports that a tree had been hit by lighting and "exploded". It sounded a bit of exaggeration so is I went up to
have a look. F* hell! They were not kidding! Huge pieces of the tree are everywhere, up to 15-20 yards away!
Poor little tree. Maybe the lord was aiming at xoggoth and got his bearings a bit wrong. Hardly surprising when
all his records are still carved on stone tablets. He needs to get up to date a bit more. Surely there would no better
time for the lord to send his message to mankind, the internet is a perect medium. Why doesn't he do it?
Weirdies all around me
Totnes in Devon is supposed to be the new age capital of the UK but for religious nuttiness I think my own local
area must be a close second. The flyer for a local village has far more adverts for psychic or dubious health
services, homeopathy, dream analysis, spiritual healing etc than it does for builders and tradesmen.
Saint Hill Manor, the centre of Scientology, one of the world's nuttiest religions, is nearby and you don't have to
go very far to find a Mormon temple either. Joseph Smith was almost as good a fraud as Hubbard although both have a
long way to go to beat Muhammad who is still conning over a billion with his bullshit.
But there are places even closer. On my walk yesterday I remembered to note down the name of a Manor I often pass
and check out what it is and discovered that a Saint once visited my village. Seems it is a centre for spiritual retreats
by members of Opus Dei, an institution within the Catholic Church that some have accused of various practices including
support of facist governents. That's disputed admittedly but what isn't is the practice of mortification of
the flesh, including whipping the buttocks. That's to drive out evil? Hmmm.
Another nearby place is a Zion Centre. There are two Christian religions with Zion in the name, an African Methodist
thing and a UK Baptist thing. I assume it's the latter. Zion Baptists are no worse than any other Bible Bashing
Christians as far as I can see, it's just puzzling that, if it is some centre for their religion, I can find no indication
whatever what this particular place is used for and I have been looking for a long time.
Almost right on the doorstep is a community inhabited largely by followers of Rudolf Steiner.
It's a nice place founded on some very hippy communist ideals in the early
70s and still pursues the ideal of community living. Steiner, a decent and fairly sensible chap generally, sought a
synthesis between science and spirituality. 50% bollux sounds better than most religions anyway.
The search for truth
In bloggoth's case the essential truth that lies behind everything is the behind. Checking out the late missus's
camera today, wondering whether to give it to the cancer charity or keep it as a spare in the van for the numerous
occasions I forget to take my own.
It's a Sony Cybershot and has "SONY" written in tiny letters just below the viewer. Turn it over and it looks like
PS Where can you get revelations of such deep meaning except on bloggoth?
I was invited by my nice religious lady friend to accompany her to Ibeza this week. Being today's F* stupid,
logical "fact"-driven xoggoth, I checked it all out, did a Google street view of the hotel area that showed
local beaches packed with loungers, checked all the travel times and costs to get to historic places that I'd really
be interested in and turned the offer down.
F* idiot!!! Only F* idiots are rational. What happened to the xoggoth who would chuck a sleeping bag, a change of
underpants and a plastic sheet into a grubby rucksack and set off to wherever chance would take me? Looking forward
to being senile when I might make more sensible decisions.
A truly proportional system
Since the election there have inevitably been calls for proportional representation. All for it, as long as it is a
real proportional system, not the flawed one proposed by the Lib Dems a few years back. There are a couple of obvious
problems. Assuming we retain the constituency system, some marginal constituencies
may not get the MP that had a local majority but that seems less important if that majority is marginal anyway. Another
flaw is that we have 650 MPs and 42 million voters so the number of MPs could not exactly
represent the vote.
My solution to that is to have a separate popularity vote. The least popular MP in each party would
undergo surgery and the parts would be sown together in correct proportions to make a genuinely representational commons.
Maybe if you took bits of Ken Clarke, Vince Cable and Ed Balls you might even be able to come up with an MP who wasn't a
PS Although we rather doubt it.
PPS But maybe it would work if we discarded the brains and just used other bits to make up the weight. A headless
corpse with three legs would make much more sensible speeches and vote much more logically than those three ever did.
It is usual these days for the simplest of products to come with pages of safety instructions
but the leaflet with some clothes we brought the other day reached a new height of daftness, stating
"remove hanger and all packaging before wearing". Does anyone really need such advice? Maybe so.
PS A grown man cuddling a teddy bear. How pathetic is that Mr P? Fancy another vodka?
Went for a walk the other day and was standing in the car park looking at my map when a group of girls, probably 13-14
I'd guess, walked by and they were all staring at me. Heard one say "get his autograph". Then one came up beside me
and said "Can I do a selfie?". While I was still going er, um, she stood next to me and took a photo of the two of us on
Trying to think who 13 year old girls would be interested in that they could have mistaken me for. I know I look
fabulously young and handsome but I'm not quite Justin Bieber. Or maybe they were doing a "who can take a selfie next
to the weirdest looking old bloke contest"
The main news item on the front page of the online Daily Mail is about the sodding royal baby and 14 of the next 15
items are also sodding royal baby related. The only exception is a thing about a kitten and I hate cats too.
The whole idea of royalty, a group of people being handed enormous privileges purely by reason of birth, really sucks.
It's an appalling example, how can we seriously criticise people who unecessarily rely on benefits when that is
If we must have a token leader to unify our nation, why not have something a whole lot cheaper?
Mr P, my little puppet parrot, would do a great job. Everyone with love him and he would cost very little.
Adequate security to prevent him being attacked by terrorists *Note 1 and a decent supply of cheap
vodka would do fine.
Note 1: He might well be a target for terrorist attacks. When you squeeze his beak it sounds
very like "Allah, Neqbah, Blaxbah" In English that means "God is a total arse and does not exist anyway. Only irrational
idiots could believe that crap."
Most people would agree that we should make reasonable provision for those with disabilities provided the
costs are fairly shared among all taxpayers. Unfortunately, small companies and individuals can, in theory, face
legal challenges if they do not devote extra time, money and effort that is quite out of proportion to the contribution
that these disabled people make to their income. This is quite wrong in principle.
The briefest browse suggest that this could require a good deal of work and money. Just trying to fully understand from
the long documents what is required or how well your small business website performs would take days even before you
make any changes. The "free" checker link on that first link takes you to a site in Spanish that does not work. Some
other checkers and guide downloads mentioned require purchase, a significant outlay before you even start.
As far as we can make out, our own small business website conforms fairly well because it's fairly simple and because
some recommendations are good SEO practice anyway. We were quite surprised to find all the main pages can be accessed
without a mouse by using the tab key and all the images have alt alternatives so may be identified by an audio reader
but some may not be so lucky.
The chances of small businesses being the subject of legal challenges appear to be low in the UK
but it may only take one disgruntled serial complainer to make a complaint. When lawyers *Note 2
see there is money to be made...
The result: 24 years after the Americans with Disabilities Act became federal law, millions of dollars have
changed hands in lawsuits -- likely raising prices to other consumers -- yet millions of small businesses still
haven't complied. They remain vulnerable to the so-called drive-by lawsuits that, once mostly confined to Southern
California and the Bay Area, are starting to appear in the Northern San Joaquin County.
"It's moving in. It's coming your way," said Julie Griffiths of California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse. She has
visited more than 1,000 hotels, shops and restaurants, many in the Valley, to document predatory lawsuits against
blindsided business owners.
Note 1: Last time I donate to those bastards!
Note 2: Why do we worry about minor groups like ISIS when we have lawyers?
...and where will it end?
Reasonable efforts to help with those with disabilities, by all means. But the law is an ass. Look at the absurd way
"human rights" are used to protect criminals and illegals while totally ignoring the rights of those they threaten
or who have to pick up the bill for them. Never mind that a foreign rapist who has contributed nothing to our society
is a huge risk to our citizens, all that is considered is his safety or right to a family life. Insane!
How long before the rights of the disabled are allowed to trump everyone else's?
Mass migration helps nobody
The news about all the drownings in the Mediteranean appears to have been drowned by even duller news about
the election and the birth of a new privileged royal parasite but it will be back in a few weeks I daresay.
The EU needs to stop this flow, we cannot keep burdening our own societies and destroying our own cultures
with a huge influx of people from Africa. There are statistics available that indicate that they are not going to be
an asset and it is a PC nonsense to pretend otherwise. When their often ridiculous expectations are not fulfilled,
one migrant interviewed on the BBC told us how he was hoping to go to Oxford University, this will just lead to
more riots and a bigger criminal underclass.
Taking in low paid workers will not help developed countries to compete with poorer nations where standards
of living are much lower and there are few workers' rights and safety laws. This approach never saved the Lancashire
textile industry and simply burdened us with some underperforming minority groups.
However, we also need to consider the long term effects of emigration on the nations that migrants come from because,
if the economies of these nations do not grow, the pressures for migration will not cease. Whatever else you can say
about these would-be migrants, they must be reasonably physically fit to travel such long distances and they at least
have the willpower and organisational skills to get off their backsides and do something. If the fittest and most
enterprising people in a nation are going to go abroad rather than try and build their own economy, how will that economy
ever improve? Remittances will not help much, there are studies that show that remittances, like foreign aid, do very
little for backward economies.
So maybe we should re-examine a host of policies covering trade, immigration and foreign aid. Instead of
emotional responses we need well thought out schemes to boost trade to the advantage of both sides. For our part we need
to encourage use of technology and reduce need for the low skilled, to concentrate on luxury goods and complex products
and services. Third world nations should be helped to provide the labour intensive goods or services which are no
longer economic for us.
Economies that complement rather than compete with each other make a lot more sense.
So boring!! No wait!!!
I'm sure I am not the only one totally bored stiff with this election and I avoid the news as much as possible.
Why anybody would base their decision on last minute promises or performance during debates lasting barely an hour
I have no idea. The only sensible guides are long term policies and attitudes and, more importantly if applicable,
their record while in power. Anyone who would trust the Labour party on the economy or immigration after their past
failures, unless they are too young to remember, must be an idiot. Anyone who can read most of the Green Party policies
and still vote for them must be stark staring insane!
Right, that's enough politics! TOOOO boring!!! Hang on a minute! The Duchess of Cambridge has just had another F*
baby!!!! F*** Hell! That news will bore us all to hell for weeks to come!!! Let's have some more interviews with
Ed Milliband. Please!
Different but confusingly similar ones are IUD="intrauterine device" and IED="improvised explosove device".
You wouldn't want to mix those up.
Never noticed it before, but STD stands both for "Sexually Transmitted Disease" and "Subscriber Trunk Dialling".
Every number I look up in the BT phone book starts with an STD number. Checked an in-law's number the other day and
now I have a big red lump on my cock. Sure it wasn't there before.
The Russian Threat
There is growing evidence of the Russian threat to Western countries.
In the DE today
there is news of attempts to turn MI6 staff.
Buying or blackmailing MI6 staff is serious enough but now the Russians are targetting the real influences in
Western society. Over the past few days the bloggoth commenty thing has been inundated with inane comments like
"Can I call you back?" and "Insert your card" originating from the Russian Federation. Clearly Putin is hoping
to distract us so that we can no longer dispense our infinite wisdom to the many Western leaders who hang on
bloggoth's every (now very occasional) word.
We have blocked them for the moment but doubtless they will find a way round it. Hang on, there's the doorbell.
Cor! There's a lovely blonde lady on the doorstep. That's more like it!
Topic: The Russian Threat
Comments so far:
Suddenly a fan
Always liked opera but never liked Gilbert & Sullivan. Saw a bit tonight that changed my mind and been
checking out some other stuff. Brill, they were the Morecombe and Wise of their time. This one is a revised version,
I don't think Wikileaks or Britney Speers were around then, but there's nowt wrong with a bit of updating to make
things more relevant to us.
PS. If the New Testament had mentioned Jesus Christ using his mobile phone and Ipad I might even take Christianity
seriously. And why couldn't he have a mobile phone? He was supposed to be god after all!
I miss you little jumper
Is life made of coincidences or are there real factors at work that we don't grasp?
As a contractor I usually had contracts with companies that were sometimes hundreds of miles from home in a place
I didn't know and I stayed at crappy B&Bs or cheap rented flats. In the initial stages at least I didn't know anyone
at all and ate alone in restaurants and spent evenings in pubs where I knew nobody. I f* loved it!!! I really missed the
late missus's lovely company but otherwise I just found it exciting in a way that I couldn't reproduce back home. New
places, new things, new people, that makes life worth living.
I had a lucky jumper, navy blue, from the Sweater Shop. Still got it but it's now so tatty it's relegated to
level 6 of the xoggoth sartorial scale, gardening and DIY. On several occasions when I wore this jumper at the pub,
usually when I was on my own, I got approached and chatted up by much younger women. Love to say it was me, my handsome
visage etc, but I have to bow to statistics, it was that jumper!
If only I could find another like it. Another one that isn't falling to bits like me I mean!
Far right? Wrong side
We keep getting this suggestion that the rise in anti-semitic attacks is down to the far right.
There have always been a few who blame the Jews for eveything but true far right support is tiny in the UK.
Why exactly would the number be rising and why would attacks by them spike during Midde East conflicts? Most sane
right wingers these days have far more objection to Muslims so it is hardly likely that they would be angered by
Israel defending itself against missile attacks from the likes of Hamas.
Most of this anti-semitism is down to Muslims and to left-wingers whose anti-Israel attitude spills over into
anti-semitism. Look at the facts about where most violence comes from, the latest attack on Farage and his family
is just the latest example it is the left who are usually responsible.
As a retired IT contractor who did my own accounts I sometimes had to search for the legal position on various
things, like what expenses one could validly claim. Often I would come across special exemptions for MPs.
Saw a CUK post to
a Guardian article today which reveals that records of MPs expenses are destroyed three years after the end
of the applicable financial year, making them immune to investigation for tax or other reasons. It is six years
for the rest of us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. You fucking corrupt bastards!!!
What a washout yesterday's eclipse was! Was in the garden and, while it was too cloudy to see the sun, I did expect
it to get very dark. Hardly noticed a damn thing, it was if the clouds just got a bit thicker!
On the BBC they were talking about how the event was viewed in history. Some believed the sun was being eaten
by evil deities supposedly. Actually, unless they were stupid, surely any peoples could put two and two together
and realise that the sun and moon would sometimes coincide as the Chinese and Babylonians did. We do get some
misconceptions about history, that most people in the middle ages thought the world was flat for example.
Maybe those carvings of the sun being eaten by a big demon were not what people at the time really thought at all,
they were cartoons! What if some catastrophe almost wiped out mankind and a future race had to figure out things
about us from a tiny number of intact records?
Democracy - love it
Due to insurance restrictions I have to be a bit more careful about where the products of my and my sister's little
company are sold and searched for a drop-down list of world nations for the website. There are three with
"democratic republic" in the official title:
Democratic People's Republic of Korea. AKA North Korea. Don't think the non-existent readers of bloggoth need
any comments from us on the realities of democracy in North Korea, unless they are earthworms anyway.
Lao People's Democratic Republic. Formerly known as Laos. One of the world's five remaining communist countries,
it is a single party state run by a politburo dominated by military generals. It is an impoverished country with
excessive reliance on export of minerals because, unlike China and Vietnam, it has not had the sense to liberalise
the economy. It is one of the world's most corrupt countries and has a very poor record for human rights and a
history of genocide against the Hmong population.
The Democratic Republic of The Congo. Formerly Zaire. Another nation with a history of conflict and extreme
corruption. The last elections in 2011 had many irregularities, including impossibly high turnouts in some areas
with all votes going to the incumbent president and results from thousands of pro-opposition polling stations going
Democracy still falls well short of what it should be in the UK due to an unrepresentative electoral system in which
results in marginal seats having undue effect, excessive influnce of business groups and leftist unions and domination of
the commons by too many with little experience outside politics or the wealthy who have no idea what impact their
policies have on ordinary people.
Still, when you look at other "democracies", and let's not forget that Islamist states like Pakistan
and the Maldives are "democracies" too, we have to be grateful for small mercies.
ISIS and the hippy movement
No denying the horrible nature of Islam or that there are groups in the West, some of them posing as moderate
movements, who are spreading the more extreme versions of the creed.
But one has to question the common assumptions of what "radicalisation" really means. Are moderate young people being
held in dark rooms and brainwashed? Are they being herded into halls and harangued for weeks by extremist Imams until
they see the error of their decadent Western ways? It would not appear so. Mostly they are "radicalised" by internet
sites that they themselves look for, by the views of those who company they themselves seek out. In other words, they are
radicalising themselves, they have already made a decision in favour of extremist Islam, they are just looking for
ways to join up. Why? This is where the hippy movement comes in. Many young people, and I knew a few, were
similarly attracted to that movement and threw away promising careers because of their rejection of materialistic
Of course hippies weren't hacking people's heads off and I am not suggesting that Bob Dylan's influence was in any
way as malignant as Anjem Chowdury's but there is one thing in common - the idealistic nature of youth and its constant
search for "meaning" in life.
The unexpected guru
Always made fun of the late missus for her propensity to write lists. Most people put important things in their
diaries but she would sometimes list trivia she did every day, like "have breakfast", "pack dishwasher" etc.
Now I have adopted her wisdom. When life is meaningless, when you can't find any real enthusiasm or interest,
you need to keep going at anything and stupid lists really help. Otherwise, you spend your day thinking "what was it
I was going to do?" and it's bedtime again before you get round to doing anything at all. Another day rushes by and there
is bugger all to show for it. It ain't much but at least fixing the fence is better than bugger all.
Let's see. Time to plan my day. Finish coffee. Have shit. Wipe arse.
Really made the effort the other day and wrote a story so I could go to the writer's club, most
of the members of which are old ladies. Not sure how much longer some of them will be around but they are a
great bunch. Who ever said old ladies are prudes? Most of the conversation between story readings soon turns to sex
and it ain't me that does it. Sat next to the chairlady last time and she touched my leg three times while
regaling us with story of her hip replacement. Anyway, back to the story.
Funny how the less depressed you get the sadder you can feel. Maybe feeling low, tired and uninterested in anything
is a good defence against feeling anything else.
Lots of pop music is crap but it's really just a matter of style, how it's played.
this Abba song sounds great
with a symphony orchestra.
Can't catch me ya bastards!
A new law has made revenge porn illegal in England and Wales.
This does not stop we at bloggoth posting a naked picture of a female who had the nerve to reject our advances recently.
Here she is in all her glory. Coooor! Look at that lovely bumhole!
It's just a totally normal picture of a sow. Sows don't wear clothes, officer.
Occasionally there's a big benefit from being a total perve!
PS England and Wales? Whatever happened to the UK? Still, at least we don't have separate laws for the Islamic
republics of Tower Hamlets, Sparkbrook, Rotherham, etc etc. Yet.
The never ending scare stories
Hardly a day goes by without another scary news story about what causes/prevents dementia. May we suggest
another major factor in this appalling disease?
"Worrying about dementia increases risk of dementia" scientists say.
This week's article we would have written if we could be arsed
At times the DT seems to be turning into the Guardian so it's nice to have a "right wing", AKA sensible and realistic,
article about the nature of some Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities in the UK and the backwardness they have brought
Is this really the UK in the 21st century? Or is it a brutish, zealously religious, feudal society (not unlike
the Tudor England of Wolf Hall), imported from South Asia and allowed to flourish here unchecked because we haven’t
had the guts to stand up for enlightened values?
The case of the Zimbabwean family whose application to attend their granddaughter's funeral was refused is
in the news again. They have reapplied.
It would be nice if immigration rules could be appled a bit more sympathetically.
It would be good if this couple could attend their granddaughters' funeral and stay a few months with their
children before returning to Zimbabwe. The problem lies in the details of our, and the EU's, ludicrous laws which
elevate one migrants's individual human rights above those of British citizens and taxpayers who may be affected
detrimentally by their presence.
Given their age, their lowly occupation as street traders, the nature of the country they come from and the fact
that their son is in the UK, the Home Office view that they may not leave looks very plausible.
The petitioners have said they pose no threat to the UK and the local MP has said the
parents have given a categorical assurance the grandparents would not claim asylum but
what is any of that worth? The son
entered the UK as an illegal immigrant and then spent a good deal of British taxpayers' money fighting
for asylum status for himself and his wife so we should hardly be accepting his assurances on this issue.
Even assurances by MPs mean little when there appear to be no legal impediments whatever to this elderly couple
claiming asylum. One would imagine that a statement of reason for visiting the UK on a visa application would rule
out any asylum application unless there was a proven change of circumstance after arrival but
it seems not. Our authorities are quite prepared to accomodate liars who make false declarations.
Does it occur to the bleeding heart liberals that, if we had less liberal laws, if a statement on a visa
application was legally binding, we could afford to be much more generous and compassionate in practice, knowing that
those laws could be readily invoked against the liars who try to take advantage of our generosity?
At last the ghastly bug appears to be gone. More importantly, we seem to be getting a reasonable amount of sleep
at night without pills (which, like all medicines, hardly worked anyway) and don't dread going to bed.
Who knows? We might even get round to posting a bit of bloggoth bollox again.
The Paris Hegbo thing
Yes, our pennyworth is a bit late but we have been feeling crap.
Should we post cartoons of that backward, fraudulent prophet? Hell yes!
I don't think we should set out to insult simply for the sake of insulting but we have to be able to criticise and
question political views that threaten our future. Islamism is not some relatively minor belief that we can afford to
ignore like Scientology. Hardly a day goes by without some atrocity perpetrated in Islam's name and there are 21
officially Islamic nations, and several others that are Islamic in all but name, which impose the irrational claptrap
of the Koran on their citizens, not just on non Muslims, but on Muslims of the wrong sort or the many who would prefer
a more free society.
While it is true that not all Muslims want to impose Shariah law on the West one has to
consider the lessons from the Islamic world, it is almost never the moderates who end up in control.
Given these realities, the huge and growing number of Muslims in the West present a colossal threat to our future.
How is it is possible for those who want rational laws to challenge the idea that the whole of society should be governed
by the supposed sayings of an 8th century prophet without suggesting that the prophet was just a flawed man, that the
Koran is nothing more than the work of mortal men?
Cartoons and comedy are necessary ways to do that. Dry, scholarly treatises are never going to reach all those we
would wish to persuade.
The PC crap goes on
Fight real racism, yes, but real racism is being opposed to those of other ethnic origins regardless of their
qualities. Much of what is branded racism is nothing of the sort but is valid objection to the presence of unsuitable
people in the UK.
How is it racist to object to the continued presence in the UK of a piece of shit like that??
It seems that scientists have managed to
slow the speed of light, not just
within certain substances, as is normal, but in a way that causes a permanent slowdown of the photons concerned
even in a vacuum. Are they mad??? Have they learned none of the lessons from our own lazy, welfare dependent society?
Once these photons have discovered they don't have to rush about at 299792458 metres per second, why would they bother
to speed up again? What is to stop them showing other photons how to do it? What is to stop them all getting ever lazier
until they are mooching slowly about the universe, even assuming they bother to leave the comfort of the stars and
other energy sources that gave them birth?
What's the point?
No sleep for days. Usual cemetary here on bloggoth and the bloggoth 3Rs are dead. Rude requires some interest in
rudeness and, with libido at rock bottom, I doubt if we'd be interested if Dawn French rang up and offered to park her
lovely big bottom on our face. (But don't let us stop you trying Dawn). Rubbish, silly cartoons and stuff, requires
imagination and we've lost it. Just leaves Rant and that ought to be doable when we are in a perpetual bad temper.
But what purpose does it serve to comment on serious issues when most are quite incapable of looking at the facts?
Forage has been criticised for saying that the events in Paris are a result of our failure to control immigration or
to ensure that migrants integrate and accept our major values. Who do they think these terrorists are if not the same
low-performing Arabs and Africans who gave France the 2007 riots? We have seen the usual articles telling us that these
people, who shout "Allah Aqba" while carrying out their atrocities are nothing to do with Islam. That makes as much sense
as saying the Inquisition or the killing of heretics in Britain's past was nothing to do with Christianity. Other articles
have stated that Islam is compatible with democracy and freedom. Do they ever bother to checkl the realities in some 20+
Islamist states and the many others where it is a state religion? We have even seen one headed "Islam is a Religion of
Love". So who is committing these daily atrocities, the wholesale slaughter, the burning of towns, the murder and
rape of women and children, the mass capture of schoolgirls, the defilement of cemetaries? Camels maybe? If they were
simply saying we should not blame all Muslims we would agree, that would be counterproductive. If you make life
difficult for more moderate elements, make it harder for them to get jobs, you may push those towards extremism too.
But the PC idiots are not simply saying that, they are talking utter crap with no basis in reality.
On immigration too, these liberals are quite incapable of simply addressing what is actually being said.
Does The Daily Mail or Express ever have a story about an asylum seeker in a modest flat? No, only about ones
housed at huge cost in expensive areas of London. Do they do articles objecting to high performing migrants in successful
careers? No, only about beggars and rough sleepers, criminals, the welfare dependant, the low paid putting pressure on
our own lower working class and the real pressures on our schools and houses. Yet pointing out just these real and
genuine problems which should be addressed is castigated
as anti-immigrant rhetoric. Most UKIP supporters don't give a damn what race migrants are as long as they are useful,
accept our values and are not coming in huge numbers that put huge strain on our resources, yet they get called racist.
Liberals are quite incapable of seeing the problems that their past errors have caused us all. It is not the White
British who are the lowest performers in the UK but major ethnic groups like Afro-Caribeans, Bangladeshis, Pakistanis
from the Kashmir region and Tamils. Any recent improvements have only come about at huge costs to the rest of us,
the recent increase in GCSE attainments for example, is due to the fact that we are spending 3 times as much per pupil
in high ethnic areas. Lax mass immigration of these groups has given us most of the terrorism outside NI since 2001,
all of the major riots, and almost all of London's worst gangs. Yet now the liberals are lauding immigration of other low
performing groups from Romania and Africa who will be our future burdens.
Until people are capable of looking at facts, arguing only against what is actually being said and stop thinking in
idealistic terms there is no real point commenting on serious issues.
We ought to know this, having done various interactive games in jscript and HTML, but it was still a surprise to find
how much crap a routine peruse of a few webpages can cause to be stored on your computer.
We were trying to find where an email utility put its settings file so we could back it up and a search of most recent
files included a mass of images just from a quick look at the online Daily Express and many did not look familiar. Most
browsers (but not Firefox apparently) will download hidden images that cannot be seen on the page, so you have no way of
knowing what is really on your PC unless you check the temporary folders. A peruse of what seems like a safe webpage
could be putting all sorts of images on your hard drive and you won't know.
Nothing unsafe or illegal on xoggoth pages officer!
Has he gone? Good. After opening this page, the non existent readers of bloggoth might like to do an *.*/today
search in Windows Explorer and scroll down to the temporary internet fles. You will find some fantastic pig porn!
A downside never counted
It is reported that one of the first Romanian migrants to enter the UK after restrictions have lifted has not
claimed benefits and has been employed since he came here:
After starting by washing cars for £30 a day, Mr Spirescu now earns £250 a day in a construction job in east London.
His parents are looking after the money he sends back to Romania.
...he is saving up to return to his village in Romania in the next couple of years and live a “beautiful life”.
Let's ignore the many who are still washing cars and cannot possibly be paying for the most basic state provisions
in the UK and concentrate on this chap. OK, he works hard for a living but, if he is sending all his spare money back
to Romania instead of spending it in ways that support or boost our economy, how does this help us? The huge amount of
money that migrants take out of our economy as remittances is just another version of foreign aid, without even the
limited checks that apply to same.
Will you find this removal of UK wealth from British people in any study of the net "benefits" of immigration? Not in
any I have seen. Of course, if much of this money was being properly invested in Romania, helping the country to build
its own modern economy there could still be a long term benefit to us all. Fat chance of that according to
It is rather the opposite in fact:
Remittances promote consumption and undermine the local economy
In a nutshell, although remittances have had some positive impact on Romania’s macroeconomic development,
capital accumulation hasn’t been put to any productive use (like opening up businesses or longer term investment),
but has rather been diverted to seemingly mindless consumption, including unnecessary housing updates and purchases
of durable goods.
A representative survey from 2006 for the typical small Romanian town of Huedin where one of three households has
a family member working abroad indicated that 52 per cent of remittances were spent on covering daily needs and expenses
while only 6 per cent were directed at starting a new business. Even more tellingly, with the orientation of remittances
towards real estate investment, house prices rocketed in the small community, reaching the level of the capital.
From a macroeconomic standpoint, had it not been for remittances, the current account deficit of Romania would have been
50 per cent higher than it is (source: Eurostat). Since remittances have mainly been used to buy current consumer goods
(56 per cent of remittances went on consumption according to the National Bank of Romania), with the lack of domestic
products and Romanians’ marked preference for foreign goods, consumption has been mainly oriented to imported goods.
Consequently, the volume of imports has increased and the current account equalization has been undermined by the
trade balance deficit which reached € 15.58 billion in 2007, 50% higher than in 2006 (source: Popescu, Juverdeanu).
Moreover, despite people’s increased expectations of future income flows, when the economic crisis halved remittances,
consumption (including outstanding bank loans) could no longer be sustained by present income levels.
Last but not least, our currency has appreciated, but unfortunately not because of any increase in domestic
competitiveness. Remittances have basically driven up the inflation rate and forced our National Bank to introduce
some aggressive monetary policies.
Romania is not an exception, you will find plenty of properly researched evidence on foreign aid which shows
that money from abroad often has no positive effects on economic growth in the recipient nations. It is simply
spent in ways that do not promote long term growth, goes mainly to the wealthy and those in power and can even have
negative consequences by impeding democracy or increasing conflict. Some links below.
Migrant remittances, like foreign aid, not only remove wealth and investment from our own
economies, they often do nothing positive for the receiving nations. Just as too easy access to welfare removes
incentives from individuals, so too can this flow of wealth from more developed nations and easy access to their
economies induce a lazy dependence by recipient nations, removing the necessity to make the hard progress over many
generations that the UK, US and other developed nations once had to do for themselves. If talented and hardworking
people are always going to go abroad rather than stay and increase the prosperity of their own nations how will their
economies ever grow?
That is not to say that richer nations should not help poorer nations to grow but rather that we need
investment in their economies that will provide a proper return for the nations concerned, and ourselves in the long
term. Real businesses making the lower technology or cheaper items that it is no longer economic for us to make ourselves
perhaps. If a competent financial advisor with a long term view would not invest in it, then neither should our
And neither should our governments continue to let migrants continually remove money from our shores
without restriction. The government (thanks to UKIP) is finally pretending to address legitimate concerns about
mass immigration. Maybe limits on foreign transfers by foreign citizens would be one way to reduce the incentive
to come here.
Professor Wood said "There are no really clear and uncontested conclusions on the effects of aid on economic growth."
Dr Evans agreed: "The broad global relationship between aid and growth will probably remain forever inconclusive."
After carrying out a regression analysis on the model, the study establishes that aid causes a negative effect
on economic expansion. The finding that aid has direct impact on growth in the structural model and that investments
drive growth implies that aid is usually not invested but instead it is channeled to other expenses.
However, this aid modality has had the unintended consequence of shifting power to the president and the
finance minister, who make most decisions regarding GBS. Furthermore, the fact that GBS entails large amounts
of funds sitting in unaudited accounts means it can be used to support corruption or as political finance.
This form of aid has also detracted from funding that used to support civil society and other forces pressing
for political reform.On the other hand, more aid has meant poorer economic performance mainly in Africa and Asia, although it is not directly realized
This means that most aid does not actually go to the poorest, instead massive and grand strategies fail to help
the vulnerable and in return the money/ grants finds it’s way to the famous and powerful politicians who instead use
it to benefit their interests. On the other hand, more aid has meant poorer economic performance mainly in Africa
and Asia, although it is not directly realized
Their finding: following high production years in the U.S., regular recipients of aid experienced a jump in both
the onset and duration of violent conflict within their borders.
Half asleep the other night when we had an idea for a story and mumbled it into our little audio recorder. A
brilliant scientist researching how the brain works is hired to analyse the memories of an Egyptian
mummy and discover where an ancient treasure was hidden.
In the morning we remembered that brains were removed during mummification. Darn it! But this evening decided
to check and it seems
they removed brains during the new kingdom but not during the old and middle kingdom so the story is
possible after all.
That isn't the most interesting fact in that link though, this is:
The Egyptians were so rough on the brain because they didn't realize its importance. They thought its purpose
was just to produce snot!
Maybe those ancient Egyptians got the wrong idea because the only people they made into mummies
were not ordinary people but leaders, the politicians of their time. Look at people like Vince Cable, Ken Clarke
and so many others in politics with no grasp of realities and the view that brains are for production of snot
looks like a very easy mistake to make.
We at bloggoth only know 3 Americans.
Well, we don't know one personally, but an online member of the non-existent bloggoth readership is a brill bloke
and has sent us a big memory stick with 32Gb of great tunes on it. Ta Mr Sheep!
Another is me sister in law in CA, although her new knee is a total stranger to me unfortunately. What was her name
again, Rosella? Knees, like all body parts, need to be talked to and given lots of vodka if you want them to keep
working. The only reason I did not need a single filling after recently visiting the dentist for the first time in over
15 years was that I stay friends with all of my teeth and they all have names beginning with T, Terry, Torrence,
Theresa, Tammy, Tarquin, Teddy, Tessa etc, etc. Complete list available in request.
The other one is my little Lexmark X1190 inkjet printer. He is my best (only) friend and I loved its little Yank voice telling
me "Printing started" and "Please load paper in the auto sheet feeder". Heartbroken today to learn Lexmark has gone out
of the market and I may not be able to get new cartridges. Is little Lenny's time on Earth over? God! (atheist version)
Does the list of funerals never stop?
The real James Bond
Watching "Tomorrow Never Dies" on TV last night. To enjoy any Bond film you have to be able to suspend all logic.
The list of totally unbelievable things in this one includes:
The idea that anyone wanting to start a world war would involve the UK these days.
A passenger in a high speed motorbike chase can exactly target the latch on a skip and release drums into the path
of the pursuers.
They continually outrun and outride massive machine gun fire. It never occurs to anyone to fire slightly ahead of
Things they do to evade capture and destroy the helicopter must kill and injure dozens of innocent bystanders
but nobody even mentions it.
Bond gets in numerous fights but his hair remains immaculately combed and his suit never has a trace of dust on it.
But those are minor flaws really. Surely the most unlikely thing by far is that a public servant would ever have such
unselfish dedication to his job.
Herbal bollux and witchcraft
One thing that all herbal medicines have in common, those for insomnia, coughs and catarhh anyway, is that a) They
taste horrible and b) they don't work. Ok, that's two things they have in common. Oh yes, and c) they are expensive for
the little bits you get. Ok, that's three things. And d) They always run down the bottle and stain your bathroom
shelves. All right! Four things!
Experts claim the voodoo medicine industry is booming with thousands of so-called “healers” in Britain luring tens of
thousands of people into their net every year.
As well as making false claims about cures, they fleece their vulnerable clients of huge chunks of cash.
Criminologist and police expert witness Dr Richard Hoskins, said: “The money being paid by some people is eye-watering. We’re talking
of hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Isn't third world immigration wonderful? Oh well, makes me feel a bit better about wasting a few quid on
crappy herbal remedies from Boots anyway.
Of course Santa is a nice Christmas tradition, along with all the others, but how many school children literally
believe he exists? Recall conversations at primary school when I was 6 or 7 and I know I didn't. Or fairies either.
Still, I would not tell other people's kids there's no Santa these days. If kids believe in him before they are old
enough to be expected to have some grasp of science and reality, it's not a problem. Some of the crap that adults
believe in, on the other hand... You can see the malignant effects of that in the news every day.
Hmmm. On second thoughts, maybe letting children believe in harmless things like Santa or The Tooth Fairy is not
training their minds the right way. Perhaps we should drill it into all kids from birth that they should only believe in
things which they have experienced or for which there is convincing evidence, that they should only follow or support
ideas which have been found effective in raising human wellbeing.
Rational education will never happen of course, too many irrational idiots will oppose it, so maybe we should
just concentrate on the issue here, poor little kids having their fantasies ruined.
Oiiii (trainee) Vicar! Santa makes as much sense as the bollux you believe in anyway!
PS Anyway, God and Santa Claus are clearly the same bloke. He just drinks and gets a bit more jolly at Xmas
like the rest of us.
xoggoth Rules of Life - 1
The more ancient you get the more often you lose things. No, that isn't the xoggoth rule, that is a general rule
that every knows. The xoggoth rule is as follows:
Whenever you lose something small, it is always the least valuable thing you have with you.
Lost something again today. Fortunately, it was only a comb, cost about 60p. Just think, if I had not had it
with me, I might have lost my glasses that cost me a whole £2.75 from the local hardware shop. I lost a pair last week
because I had not replaced my last lost comb. Not carrying the various cheapest things in turn could have cost me
my Tesco £17 mobile phone, my scratched old £23 plastic strap watch, and finally my wallet.
PS Sorry little comb, I will go and look for you in the car park tomorrow! I am not made of 60ps.
Suicide - not being arsed
If people are suicidal how can they summon up the enthusiasm to actually bother to snuff themselves? Surely that
takes a degree of determination that is incompatible with the desire?
Ring! Ring! Hello? Assisted suicide line? Can you send me a taxi to take me to the railway bridge please?
What? I have to fill in an online health and safety assessment? Never mind.
Christmas - not being arsed
We at bloggoth could not be arsed to buy a Christmas tree this year. Bunged all the tree decorations in an old
fish tank - much easier and cheaper.
Off to buy christmas presents tomorrow. Used to get them from The Pound Shop. What a rippoff! The 99p Store
is much better.
Learning from nature
We at bloggoth are very selective about removing weeds from the garden as some are very decorative. Why waste money
on cultivated plants when you can get wildflowers for free? This little daisy on our patio was rather nice so we
One year on and daisies are spreading in every direction:
Bit like immigration really. Let a few useful migrants in from poor countries and it will not be long before
you have hordes of them and parts of our nation become scarcely recognisable.
Stay out of my milestones, you bastards!
In student days, just a few times, we sang blues at a local club. Our favourite was "St James Infirmary" but, today,
we cannot find the version we remember. We recall it was on the B side of a record by a singer of rather brief fame
and can almost, but not quite, remember his name. Google brings up umpteen versions by famous performers, The Animals,
Arlo Guthry, Cab Calloway, Van Morrison etc etc but FUCK IT! none of those are the version we remember.
Now we cannot find the singer of another song, "Ghost Riders in the Sky" It has been done by Marty Robbins,
Duane Eddy, Johny Cash and many other famous singers but, FUCK FUCK FUCK IT, none of these are the version we remember.
Look, you bastards, those were milestones in xoggoth's life and you have no FUCKING rights to intrude on them without
my permission! I bet Kim Jong-un will never have this problem.
Tonight's local crime news included a CCTV of a robbery in a jewellery shop.
Nowadays, one can even get fairly cheap CCTV for one's premises that allows you to use the internet and monitor
your property remotely from your smart phone or other device in real time. One can control devices remotely too,
one commonly advertised system allows you to control your home heating.
So why are we not taking the obvious steps, in both law and technology, to allow proper defence of our property?
Went to the Tate Modern art gallery with my weird religious lady today. Some good stuff there but there was also an
awful lot of utter crap!!!
There were at least three "artworks" that consisted of entirely blank canvases. Maybe the first person who
came up with the idea of a blank canvas as art can be credited with making an original point about the futility of life
or some such bollux but how many times can this same bloody nonsense be regarded as meaningful? Surprised he/she is not
suing the many others who have done it since for breach of copyright! Even when the artists actually bothered to do
something much of it was utter shit, scrawls that looked like the work of infants, old car engines with shiny bits on
them, rough lumps of clay that looked like big dog turds etc. One "sculpture" was this piece of galvanised
steel ducting much like I have on my hot air central heating.
Wow! I didnt know I had a valueable artwork in my garage! Surprised we haven't seen an "artist" exhibiting bits of
his used toilet paper yet.
Still, there is a plus side, if crap like that is the work of a famous artist it makes one feel much better about
one's own crap. Here's a biro sketch I did recently at a U3A art session. Off top of head, not copied.
Have you read about that cannibalism case? Bloke caught eating a woman's face, how awful! If it was me I'd have
been caught eating her bottom!
Seriously, why is insanity always such a bad thing? Even when they don't commit crimes, the insane are always a
burden on others and are nearly always unhappy themselves. Wouldn't it be great to have a benign form of insanity?
A form that allowed you to experience fantastic feelings and visions without taking any drugs but come back into the
real world whenever it was necessary.
Nice sunny morning today so went for my walk early. Ducking under a Holly tree and a spikey leaf poked me in the eye
so I said "bloody Holly!" If I suffered from benign insanity, all the Holly trees would have started singing
"It Doesn't Matter Anymore" to accompany me on my walk.
Bloody Holly trees are still rehearsing, so Buddy Holly's version will have to do.
As bloggoth moderator I have to warn you that your comment about eating a woman's bottom is in poor taste.
Rubbish! Womens' bottoms taste fantastic!
Brought some cheap jeans at Sainsburies the other day. Took the label off the front but failed to notice there
was a stick-on label low down at the back. Have been walking about in public for a couple of days with a large gold
circle reading "With stretch" over my bottom!
Could have been worse I suppose, I could have been in Brighton and there could have been a stick-on price label that
I also failed to notice. Oooooh! You don't get xoggoth's bumhole for £10 ducky! Cost you 15 quid at least!
Old age and cancer
What fun they are. Remember talking to an elderly lady up the club a few years ago who said, with a wry smile,
that her main social events these days were funerals. Know how she feels, when you get to a certain age, funerals seem
to be the main events in life. First the mother in law, then the missus, then my sister's husband,
all in the space of less than two years. Not to mention an aunt and a cousin of the missus's that I did not know well.
The late missus's brother just phoned to say his father has died so there will be another soon.
Oh well. At least I'm getting a lot of use out of the black suit I spent a whole £99 on at Burton's!
Darn it. When will I get any real sense of life back? Probably going out more than I ever did in the
last few decades when it was so much nicer to spend time with the missus. When we weren't doing anything special
and just did our own things she was around for those little meets over coffee, wine, vodka/whisky according to
mood and time of day, in the garden, conservatory or in front of the TV.
I go drinking up the village club (me and Mr Pikey Scum actually exchanged a grunted hello the other day), spend
time with various wierd women, wander the country for hours, do countryside volunteer stuff, force myself to go
to choir or art sessions but none of that is really living in my view.
Just want to get back my imagination and some enthusiasm for the things I used to like doing, writing stupid short
stories, cartooning, surreal paintings, posting bollux here, making wierd things out of junk or looking at bugs in my
microscope but I just can't get interested. When not going out, I just work through my list of little DIY jobs, tiddle
on the computer to no obvious purpose, watch some drivel on TV or read horror stories, finishing each with "What a load
of crap". There don't seem to be any quick solutions, alcohol does nothing. When I'm on my own I think I fancy a vodka
and don't always finish it.
Life starts inside. If that isn't there, the life around us is nothing more than a TV screen, a lot of dull Sky
TV Channels that you idly flick through, only to find nothing that grabs you.
Talking of horror (?)
Brought a couple of collections the other day. Read about 20 stories so far and one or two are ok. The stuff
Henry James or others of his era wrote were genuinely creepy because they stuck to the point of the story. Modern stuff
is so full of padding that goes beyond just characterisation and setting the scene.
In the one I read last night a man had a car accident that killed his wife and also filled him with glass fragments
that were working their way out. There is some sort of link between those and his wife trying to be free and and an
undiscovered cave, erm, fair enough I suppose. But quite why there are two pages about him looking round his old school
and remembering how it was and being asked if he had seen a missing child I have no idea, it has nothing to do with
Ah, but maybe I am just being old fashioned, too stuck in the ways of a career spent writing concise technical
reports. I need to learn that irrelevance. Let's see, this item is about horror stories, so er um. Did you know that
a lightning bolt generates temperatures five times hotter than those found at the sun's surface?
Isn't religion lovely?
Who among the non-existent old fart readership of bloggoth does not remember "Rivers of Bablylon" by Boney M?
The lyrics are from the bible Psalm 137. The part that was not included in the song was this:
O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed;
happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us.
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones
PS Oi! Moses! Sue em for copyright infringement!
Bit of a loose end last night, not in mood to be on me tod but getting fed up with the village club so
went to the cinema club in nearby village. Fantastic! Film about a bloke dying of cancer! Didn't stay, then walked
back to the van past two funeral directors including bloody Ballard & Shortall!
On plus side it started with this bit of music I've never heard before.
Shoulda been me
Advice to the non existent readers of bloggoth who are not old farts. (The only two I know of are old farts!)
Memory gradually fades. Think twice before you throw anything away, no matter how unimportant it seems at the time,
it could be an important bit of your own history, summit to look back on when you're sitting drooling in the sun
outside the care home.
I never watch anything on TV these days except the news and cartoons like The Simpsons but decided to try New Tricks
tonight and it covered something from the cold war days when selected people were contacted with a view to them
helping to organise things in Britain in the aftermath of a nuclear armageddon. I got an invite to be part of such a
group *Note 1 and I ignored it, thought "how stupid" and chucked the letter.
Darn it! If only I had replied in the affirmative and the world had really been blown to smithereens I might have
been one of the world leaders today! If I had at least kept the letter it would have been a great bit of my personal
history. I've still got my post war ID and my Edward Heath petrol rationing book but they ain't the same.
*Presumably because I was one of the few in those days to get a first class honours degree.
PS: Having an M.Sc (distinction), being more successful and having a much bigger conservatory does not come close!
The Independent reports on "the dowry violence shaming Britain". Don't blame me sunshine. The shame lies with the minority communities who
bring this backward crap into Britain with them.
Of course our governments deserve some criticism for not outlawing this practice, especially given that
it is outlawed in India and Pakistan, two of the main nations from which we import it into the UK.
What our PC establishment constantly fails to grasp is that, when fear of appearing racist makes them turn a blind eye to
migrant and minority problems like dowries, black gang crime, honour killings, FGM, the cast system,
forced marriage, child beggars, abuse of children during witchcraft rituals or whatever, it is the members of those
minorities who feel the consequences.
Given the reality of "the wall of silence", tackling these things comes at an immense cost to the British taxpayer
of course, yet another cost which is never included in those estimates of the "benefits" of immigration. If our
governments deserve blame for these problems, the biggest share of it should be for their failure to have firm immigration
policies to ensure, as far as possible, that they never entered the UK in the first place.